Domognostics+ Integrated Platform - Usability Evaluation
Information and consent
Consent: *
Yes | No | |
---|---|---|
I provide my explicit consent for my participation in the usability evaluation of the Domognostics+ Platform and for the subsequent processing of the data and information I provide, in accordance with the project's research protocol: |
Evaluation feedback
1. Functional suitability (Degree to which the tool provides functions that meet the stated and implied needs when used under the pre-specified conditions) *
Poor | Good | Very good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Functional completeness (Degree to which the set of provided functions covers all the specified tasks and user objectives) | ||||
Functionality appropriateness (Degree to which the functions facilitate the accomplishment of specified tasks and objectives) |
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.
2. Reliability (Degree to which a system, product or component performs specified functions under specified conditions for a specified period of time) *
Poor | Good | Very good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Availability (Degree to which a system, product or component is operational and accessible when required for use) | ||||
Maturity (Degree to which a system, product or component meets needs for reliability under normal operation) |
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.
3. Usability (Degree to which a product or system can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction in a specified context of use) *
Poor | Good | Very good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Appropriateness recognisability (Degree to which users can recognize whether a product or system is appropriate for their needs. Appropriateness recognisability will depend on the ability to recognize the appropriateness of the product or system’s functions from initial impressions of the product or system and/or any associated documentation) | ||||
Learnability (Degree to which a product or system can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals of learning to use the product or system with effectiveness, efficiency, freedom from risk and satisfaction in a specified context of use) | ||||
Operability (Degree to which a product or system has attributes that make it easy to operate and control. Operability corresponds to controllability, (operator) error tolerance and conformity with user expectations) | ||||
User interface aesthetics (Degree to which a user interface enables pleasing and satisfying interaction for the user. This refers to properties of the product or system that increase the pleasure and satisfaction of the user, such as the use of colour and the nature of the graphical design) | ||||
User error protection (Degree to which a system protects users against making errors) |
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.
4. Performance efficiency (Performance relative to the amount of resources used under stated conditions) *
Poor | Good | Very good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Time Behaviour (Degree to which the response and processing times and throughput rates of a product or system, when performing its functions, meet requirements) |
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.
5. Maintainability (Degree of effectiveness and efficiency with which a product or system can be modified by the intended maintainers) *
Poor | Good | Very good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Analysability (Degree of effectiveness and efficiency with which it is possible to assess the impact on a product or system of an intended change to one or more of its parts, or to diagnose a product for deficiencies or causes of failures, or to identify parts to be modified) | ||||
Modifiability (Degree to which a product or system can be effectively and efficiently modified without introducing defects or degrading existing product quality) |
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.
6. Compatibility (Degree to which a product, system or component can exchange information with other products, systems or components, and/or perform its required functions, while sharing the same hardware or software environment) *
Poor | Good | Very good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Co-existence (Degree to which a product can perform its required functions efficiently while sharing a common environment and resources with other products, without detrimental impact on any other product) | ||||
Interoperability (Degree to which two or more systems, products or components can exchange information and use the information that has been exchanged) |
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.
7. Beyond the usability evaluation *
Poor | Good | Very good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Effectiveness of the tool | ||||
Innovativeness of the tool | ||||
Usefulness of the tool | ||||
Potential sustainability of the tool |
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.